|
The
Official
smallDICK dickSIZE
Survey Results
There were
a total of 4555 responses used in
the following calculations.
A SNAPSHOT OF THE "AVERAGE"
DICK
As at Monday, November 17, 2003,
17:16:10. |
| Our average dick as caculated based
on our current data as of Monday, November 17, 2003, 17:16:10,
is approximately 3.08 inches SOFT and reaches
a length of 5.89 inches HARD. That
represents a change in length from SOFT to HARD of 2.81
inches. It's HARD thickness is about 4.93 inches. |
| An approximation of the actual size
of the current Overall Average as viewed on a 17" monitor
at a screen resolution of 1024 x 768 pixels. |
  >/td> |
 |
|
|
|
PRECEIVED HARD DICK LENGTH CATEGORIES
The figures in the following table represent respondents'
answers to the question asking whether they consider their
HARD dick LENGTH to be: small, average, or big. The figures
in the second column represent the actual number of responses
for that particular category and the last column shows a graphical
representation of the percentage for each category.
|
|
| Small |
1920 |
42.2% |
|
| Average |
1979 |
43.4% |
|
| Big |
656 |
14.4% |
|
|
|
THE GENERAL HARD DICK LENGTH CATEGORIES
The small, average, and big categories in the following
table represent the average length range (5" to 7") generally
agreed upon by many "scientific" and informal research studies. The
bracketed figures in the first row are the actual number of
respondent who fall into that category. The percentage figure
in the center of each general length category represents the
percentage of respondents who actually fall within the range
of that category.
|
|
| Small (833) |
Average (3065) |
Big (660) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOFT DICK LENGTH
The following table represents all SOFT
dick lengths reported to-date. The first column shows the
actual SOFT dick length reported, the second column shows
the actual number of respondents reporting a particular length,
and the third column shows a graphical representation of the
percentage for each length.
|
|
| 1.00" |
147 |
3.2% |
|
| 1.25" |
80 |
1.8% |
|
| 1.50" |
211 |
4.6% |
|
| 1.75" |
152 |
3.3% |
|
| 2.00" |
460 |
10.1% |
|
| 2.25" |
207 |
4.5% |
|
| 2.50" |
373 |
8.2% |
|
| 2.75" |
250 |
5.5% |
|
| 3.00" |
707 |
15.5% |
|
| 3.25" |
284 |
6.2% |
|
| 3.50" |
405 |
8.9% |
|
| 3.75" |
216 |
4.7% |
|
| 4.00" |
365 |
8.0% |
|
| 4.25" |
134 |
2.9% |
|
| 4.50" |
172 |
3.8% |
|
| 4.75" |
81 |
1.8% |
|
| 5.00" |
128 |
2.8% |
|
| 5.25" |
43 |
0.9% |
|
| 5.50" |
55 |
1.2% |
|
| 5.75" |
12 |
0.3% |
|
| 6.00" |
25 |
0.5% |
|
| 6.25" |
7 |
0.2% |
|
| 6.50" |
7 |
0.2% |
|
| 6.75" |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| 7.00" |
12 |
0.3% |
|
| 7.25" |
4 |
0.1% |
|
| 7.50" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 7.75" |
1 |
0.0% |
|
| 8.00" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 8.25" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 8.50" |
1 |
0.0% |
|
| 9.00" |
1 |
0.0% |
|
| 9.25" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 9.50" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
OVERALL
AVERAGE SOFT DICK LENGTH: 3.08 Inches
|
|
|
HARD DICK LENGTH
The following table represents all HARD dick lengths
reported to-date. The first column shows the actual HARD dick
lengths reported, the second column shows the actual number
of respondents reporting a particular length, and the third
column shows a graphical representation of the percentage
for each length.
|
|
| 1.25" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 1.50" |
3 |
0.1% |
|
| 2.00" |
10 |
0.2% |
|
| 2.25" |
10 |
0.2% |
|
| 2.50" |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| 2.75" |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| 3.00" |
18 |
0.4% |
|
| 3.25" |
25 |
0.5% |
|
| 3.50" |
48 |
1.1% |
|
| 3.75" |
52 |
1.1% |
|
| 4.00" |
105 |
2.3% |
|
| 4.25" |
97 |
2.1% |
|
| 4.50" |
206 |
4.5% |
|
| 4.75" |
246 |
5.4% |
|
| 5.00" |
379 |
8.3% |
|
| 5.25" |
297 |
6.5% |
|
| 5.50" |
424 |
9.3% |
|
| 5.75" |
473 |
10.4% |
|
| 6.00" |
460 |
10.1% |
|
| 6.25" |
281 |
6.2% |
|
| 6.50" |
270 |
5.9% |
|
| 6.75" |
235 |
5.2% |
|
| 7.00" |
245 |
5.4% |
|
| 7.25" |
154 |
3.4% |
|
| 7.50" |
135 |
3.0% |
|
| 7.75" |
89 |
2.0% |
|
| 8.00" |
97 |
2.1% |
|
| 8.25" |
51 |
1.1% |
|
| 8.50" |
34 |
0.7% |
|
| 8.75" |
26 |
0.6% |
|
| 9.00" |
21 |
0.5% |
|
| 9.25" |
9 |
0.2% |
|
| 9.50" |
11 |
0.2% |
|
| 9.75" |
9 |
0.2% |
|
| 10.00" |
23 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
OVERALL
AVERAGE HARD DICK LENGTH: 5.89 Inches
|
|
|
SOFT TO HARD LENGTH CHANGE
The following table represents the SOFT to HARD dick
length changes calculated using the SOFT and HARD dick lengths
reported to-date. The first column shows the actual SOFT to
HARD dick length change as calculated, the second column shows
the actual number of respondents matching a particular length
change, and the third column shows a graphical representation
of the percentage for each length change category.
|
|
| 1.00" |
59 |
1.3% |
|
| 1.25" |
102 |
2.2% |
|
| 1.50" |
176 |
3.9% |
|
| 1.75" |
234 |
5.1% |
|
| 2.00" |
442 |
9.7% |
|
| 2.25" |
430 |
9.4% |
|
| 2.50" |
528 |
11.6% |
|
| 2.75" |
465 |
10.2% |
|
| 3.00" |
533 |
11.7% |
|
| 3.25" |
369 |
8.1% |
|
| 3.50" |
361 |
7.9% |
|
| 3.75" |
251 |
5.5% |
|
| 4.00" |
236 |
5.2% |
|
| 4.25" |
111 |
2.4% |
|
| 4.50" |
86 |
1.9% |
|
| 4.75" |
40 |
0.9% |
|
| 5.00" |
44 |
1.0% |
|
| 5.25" |
14 |
0.3% |
|
| 5.50" |
11 |
0.2% |
|
| 5.75" |
4 |
0.1% |
|
| 6.00" |
5 |
0.1% |
|
| 6.25" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 6.50" |
2 |
0.0% |
|
| 6.75" |
1 |
0.0% |
|
| 7.00" |
1 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
OVERALL
AVERAGE SOFT TO HARD DICK LENGTH DIFFERENCE: 2.81 Inches
|
|
|
HARD DICK THICKNESS (Circumference)
The following table represents all HARD dick circumferences
reported to-date. The first column shows the actual HARD dick
circumferences reported, the second column shows the actual
number of respondents reporting a particular circumference,
and the third column shows a graphical representation of the
percentage of each circumference.
Please Note: I've had to make a necessary adjustments
to this section. Many of the early respondants appear to have
been reporting thier HARD dick's thicknesses well under the
lowest measurements generally reported by many "scientific"
and informal studies. I suspect that respondent were reporting
their dick's diameter (across the center) rather than their
dick's circumference (around the perimeter). I have since
added dick measurement instructions to the survey questionnaire
specifiying for thickness a measurement of circumference.
To compensate for this probably error, I have chosen to convert
any reported thickness measurement that I suspect is diameter
into is approximate circumference equivalent (i.e. 2.50" diameter
is about a 5" circumference). Just for the record, 319
respondents reported thicknesses of 2.50" or less. That represents
7% of the respondents. Most other survery show significantly
smaller percentages below a 2.50" circumference (around 2.5%).
Many studies report the average circumference range from 4"
to 6".
|
|
| 2.75" |
52 |
1.1% |
|
| 3.00" |
147 |
3.2% |
|
| 3.25" |
70 |
1.5% |
|
| 3.50" |
86 |
1.9% |
|
| 3.75" |
110 |
2.4% |
|
| 4.00" |
345 |
7.6% |
|
| 4.25" |
221 |
4.9% |
|
| 4.50" |
400 |
8.8% |
|
| 4.75" |
375 |
8.2% |
|
| 5.00" |
1083 |
23.8% |
|
| 5.25" |
407 |
8.9% |
|
| 5.50" |
479 |
10.5% |
|
| 5.75" |
203 |
4.5% |
|
| 6.00" |
283 |
6.2% |
|
| 6.25" |
88 |
1.9% |
|
| 6.50" |
77 |
1.7% |
|
| 6.75" |
26 |
0.6% |
|
| 7.00" |
51 |
1.1% |
|
| 7.25" |
11 |
| | |